Communities of Experience: How a shared memory journey can facilitate social cohesion

People tend to share their experiences and to relate them to other people’s experiences. In these social processes, people recognize similarities between their experiences and this, in turn, creates feelings of sameness and peerness based on the assumption of having experienced something together or having experienced a ‘same’ thing. Starting with this simple observation, we claim that there emerge overlapping, complex and historically determined communities of identification, that is, communities of experience.

Ville Kivimäki, Antti Malinen and Ville Vuolanto, Tampere University

While researchers from HEX, the Centre of Excellence for History of Experience at Tampere University focus on history, we jump forward from their framing of the concept of ‘communities of experience’ to riff on the rich potentials of shared memory journeys as a means to build ties of kinship and community.

There is no word in English that resembles the Finnish concept of muistitieto; it translates as memory knowledge but that barely scratches the surface of the notion of lived experience and living history captured by the Finnish word.

Historian and oral history scholar Rachel F. Seidman wrote on making sense of muistitieto, given that Finnish was a spoken language and the Finnish culture an oral one until very recently. From Dr Seidman’s post:

The word they use to refer to both these written reminiscences and oral history interviews is muistitieto, which translates to memory knowledge, or recollected knowledge (whereas the literal translation for what we call oral history would be suullinen historia). In her article about oral history in the Nordic Baltic countries of Finland, Sweden, Latvia, and Estonia, Anne Heimo writes that the advantage of muistitieto is that it highlights the “nature” of the source—that is, the individualized memories of living people—rather than focusing on whether those are passed down in oral or written form.

Rachel F. Seidman

Read Dr. Seidman’s blog for her own challenges with the use of the word in Finland and the fact that it is used to describe tangible artefacts in the form of written narratives as well as the oral living memory of the people writing it. English separates oral history – the spoken word and all its nuances of tone and cadence – from memoirs or diaries or other written or captured formats. However, she adds:

As an American oral historian, I still don’t quite understand treating these invaluable documents as “the same” as oral history interviews—for one thing, I don’t think that does justice to the “co-created” nature of oral history interviews—the way that oral histories are very much created by two people meeting in real time, in a particular moment, together. The results are shaped not only by the questions asked by the interviewer and the responses of the interviewee; but also by the assumptions both parties make about each other; the communication across lines of race, class, gender, education, region, age; even the “chemistry” or lack of it between the two people involved.

All of these factors shape oral history narratives in ways that make them seem quite different from what might happen when a person sits at her kitchen table to write down her memories of a particular place or event for an imagined audience, with the hopes of winning a competition. Nor does grouping these two forms together address the orality of oral history audio—what we can learn from the pauses, emotion, pace, or intensity of the spoken words. But while I might not call it the same thing, I definitely agree that these written narratives are rich documents full of important lessons to be learned….

Rachel F. Seidman

Be that as it may, the beauty of our own work at Ymmärrys ry is that we are artists and designers; creative practitioners with the unspoken license to transcend the limitations of academic definitions and disciplinary boundaries. The outcomes of our work may not even be in written or recorded form – it could be a collage or a painting or a collectively made quilt. The point of collaborative co-creation of the shared muistitieto experience is for strengthening community, cohesion, and shared understanding.

Share:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Design practice leads the way

The conceptual framework is excellent, the 7 prototypes selected heavily skew towards cutting edge technology integration. Eco-social renewal does not equal technological intervention by unquestioned

Preparedness, Resilience, Transformation

Ymmärrys ry offers a diagnostic toolkit that blends science with arts and innovation for a structured approach to resilient transformation and sustainable futures.

Creativity

is the heart and soul

of our philosophy

Ymmärrys ry believes that creativity is an innate quality of every human being, which can be expressed through experimentation and practice. Given the right tools and the right encouragement and guidance, one can develop and cultivate the ability to use this innate quality. We collaborate with groups and communities to nurture and harness their own capacity and agency for creative expression, by engaging with storytelling practices, oral histories, narratives of change, intangible heritage, and local knowledge. All of the different ways of knowing, making, doing, and creating can be manifested tangibly through participatory and inclusive activities informed by art and design. All we need is a little helping hand to uncover and make visible our own stories and share them in various creative ways.

We recognize and honor our shared creative spark.

 

Explore Further

Agency

Agency is the motive driver of our collective creative practices: we believe that experiencing a sense of our own capacity for creativity and innovation fosters agency for self-determined changes. Through our projects and activities we are motivated by the experience of sharing the creative spark and energy of collaboration; collaborative sensemaking guides and directs the roadmap of our transformation journey, while exploration and discovery of our creative selves in a safe space brings to light our own stories.

We are the agents of our own transformation journeys.

Explore Further

Innovation

We conceptualize sustainability as collective social change (Aguilera et al., 2007; Hargrave and Van de Ven, 2006), and have developed social processes that are place-based and community-centric. In our projects and activities we aim to introduce creative practices for collaboration and cooperation to foster capacity for learning and experimentation. Our aim is to accelerate our capacity for transformation in a resilient and sustainable manner on an individual and communal level, through custom-designed methods and tools, to bridge the knowing-doing gap.

Explore Further

Design practice leads the way

The conceptual framework is excellent, the 7 prototypes selected heavily skew towards cutting edge technology integration. Eco-social renewal does not equal technological intervention by unquestioned

Read More »
We would like to collaborate with you

We’re actively seeking out collaborators and cooperators to codesign novel and impactful social interventions that are inclusive, democratic, and participatory in the best Scandinavian traditions of collective work related innovation.

Read More »

Futures

In building a positive future, art and design plays an integral role in social harmony and innovation thinking. Our collaborative and cooperative creative practices and innovation methods provide the social infrastructure for self determined roadmaps for transformation.

Cognitive Justice: the right of different knowledges to coexist so long as they sustain the life, livelihoods, and life chances of a people. (Visvanathan, 2021)

Creative practices allow us to manifest the unseen and the unknown, the embodied and experiential knowledge, the senses and the emotions: they make visible and tangible a narrative of change that meets our deepest needs and reflects our own, self-determined vision of a better future.

Explore Further

Design practice leads the way

The conceptual framework is excellent, the 7 prototypes selected heavily skew towards cutting edge technology integration. Eco-social renewal does not equal technological intervention by unquestioned

Read More »