Community-led forest management doubles Nepal’s forest cover in a single generation

The maps above show forest cover in Nepal in 1992 (top) and 2016 (bottom). Between these years, forest cover in the country almost doubled, from 26% to 45%.

In the 1970s, Nepal was facing an environmental crisis. Forests in Nepal’s hillsides were being degraded due to livestock grazing and fuelwood harvesting, which led to increased flooding and landslides. In the 1980s and 1990s, Nepal’s government began to reassess its national-level forest management practices, which led to a pivotal forestry act in 1993. This legislation allowed Nepal’s forest rangers to hand over national forests to community forest groups. The result of this community-led management was a near-doubling of forest cover in the small mountainous country.

Under community forest management, local forest rangers worked with the community groups to develop plans outlining how they could develop and manage the forests. People were able to extract resources from the forests (fruits, medicine, fodder) and sell forest products, but the groups often restricted grazing and tree cutting, and they limited fuelwood harvests. Community members also actively patrolled forests to ensure they were being protected.

One community forest (called Devithan or sacred grove in Nepali) had only 12% forest cover in 1988, which grew to 92% in 2016. Although the Devithan community forest wasn’t a formal community forest until 2000, the community organized into an informal community forest management group (with laws limiting grazing and fuelwood collecting) after the 1993 forestry act.

The study found that trees and vegetation rapidly regenerated, expanding canopy cover and the availability of fodder within the first few years of informal management. Within the boundaries of this community forest, about 25% of total forest regeneration happened before Nepal’s forest rangers formally recognized them as a community group.

Science, images, references, and text from NASA Earth Observatory.

Share:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Design practice leads the way

The conceptual framework is excellent, the 7 prototypes selected heavily skew towards cutting edge technology integration. Eco-social renewal does not equal technological intervention by unquestioned

Preparedness, Resilience, Transformation

Ymmärrys ry offers a diagnostic toolkit that blends science with arts and innovation for a structured approach to resilient transformation and sustainable futures.

Creativity

is the heart and soul

of our philosophy

Ymmärrys ry believes that creativity is an innate quality of every human being, which can be expressed through experimentation and practice. Given the right tools and the right encouragement and guidance, one can develop and cultivate the ability to use this innate quality. We collaborate with groups and communities to nurture and harness their own capacity and agency for creative expression, by engaging with storytelling practices, oral histories, narratives of change, intangible heritage, and local knowledge. All of the different ways of knowing, making, doing, and creating can be manifested tangibly through participatory and inclusive activities informed by art and design. All we need is a little helping hand to uncover and make visible our own stories and share them in various creative ways.

We recognize and honor our shared creative spark.

 

Explore Further

Agency

Agency is the motive driver of our collective creative practices: we believe that experiencing a sense of our own capacity for creativity and innovation fosters agency for self-determined changes. Through our projects and activities we are motivated by the experience of sharing the creative spark and energy of collaboration; collaborative sensemaking guides and directs the roadmap of our transformation journey, while exploration and discovery of our creative selves in a safe space brings to light our own stories.

We are the agents of our own transformation journeys.

Explore Further

Innovation

We conceptualize sustainability as collective social change (Aguilera et al., 2007; Hargrave and Van de Ven, 2006), and have developed social processes that are place-based and community-centric. In our projects and activities we aim to introduce creative practices for collaboration and cooperation to foster capacity for learning and experimentation. Our aim is to accelerate our capacity for transformation in a resilient and sustainable manner on an individual and communal level, through custom-designed methods and tools, to bridge the knowing-doing gap.

Explore Further

Design practice leads the way

The conceptual framework is excellent, the 7 prototypes selected heavily skew towards cutting edge technology integration. Eco-social renewal does not equal technological intervention by unquestioned

Read More »
We would like to collaborate with you

We’re actively seeking out collaborators and cooperators to codesign novel and impactful social interventions that are inclusive, democratic, and participatory in the best Scandinavian traditions of collective work related innovation.

Read More »

Futures

In building a positive future, art and design plays an integral role in social harmony and innovation thinking. Our collaborative and cooperative creative practices and innovation methods provide the social infrastructure for self determined roadmaps for transformation.

Cognitive Justice: the right of different knowledges to coexist so long as they sustain the life, livelihoods, and life chances of a people. (Visvanathan, 2021)

Creative practices allow us to manifest the unseen and the unknown, the embodied and experiential knowledge, the senses and the emotions: they make visible and tangible a narrative of change that meets our deepest needs and reflects our own, self-determined vision of a better future.

Explore Further

Design practice leads the way

The conceptual framework is excellent, the 7 prototypes selected heavily skew towards cutting edge technology integration. Eco-social renewal does not equal technological intervention by unquestioned

Read More »